Introduction:
The Mole
As with any area of technical expertise, chemists
have a unit of quantity, known as the mole. It is no different from, say,
a unit of length; e.g. a meter. Having distance in meters allows one to
convert it to any other unit of choice, by simply looking up the relevant
conversion factor. So too with the mole, once it is known for any substance
in a given chemical reaction, then the quantity of all other substances
can be derived by using the appropriate conversion factor. In our case,
these conversions are dependent on the reaction in question and can only
be arrived at using a balanced chemical reaction. Coefficients before each
substance will be used to make our conversion factors.
Why use the mole(?), since the fundamental
unit of an element or a compound is an atom or molecule, respectively.
Why not use the mass of the individual atom or the sum of the atoms that
make up the molecule? Size is the issue here, the mass of an atom is so
small (~10-23 g) that, while it is possible to determine, it
is impractical to do so in most laboratory experiments. Somewhat analogous
to the fact that when you refer to the distance from Amherst to Northampton
you speak in terms of ~10miles rather than ~1,600,000 cms! A more practical
mass range from the laboratory perspective is in the gram range, 1-300g.
In order to define the mole in terms the fundamental unit (atom/molecule),
a standard had to be chosen, and this turned out to be the number of atoms
in twelve grams of pure carbon twelve (an isotope of carbon with mass number
12). The number of atoms turns out to be 6.023x1023 atoms, which
has come to be known as Avogadro's Number. Apart from its large size there
is nothing special about this number, and if a different standard were
chosen it would have a different value. A mole can thus be redefined as
the mass of any substance that contains 6.023x1023 units of
that substance. Its use is pretty much confined to atoms and molecules
and the unit is hardly likely to replace the dozen when it comes to large
objects such as eggs! The mass of any element that corresponds to 6.023x1023
atoms of that element is equal to its molar mass, which for an element
can be found in the periodic table. The masses listed on the table are
in fact average values, derived from the various isotopes of the elements
and their natural abundance's. For molecules, the molar mass is the sum
of the individual atoms that make up the molecule.
In summary: 1mole is equal to 6.023x1023
atoms (or molecules) which in turn is equal to the atomic mass of the element
or the molar mass of the molecule in grams per mole.
In the laboratory, from a stoichiometry point
of view, you can classify the substances that you will be dealing with
as either, solids, solutions, or gases. For this experiment we will be
dealing exclusively with solids where:
# moles = # mass (in grams) /molar mass
Determining the Formula of a Compound
One of the most exciting aspects of chemistry is
the discovery of some new substance when one element reacts with another.
In order to know one has made a new substance, the formula of the compound
formed must be determined quantitatively. This must involve determining
the mole ratio and not the gram
ratio. The gram ratio gives no meaningful information since the
individual masses are not related to equivalent number of atoms.
While the experiment that you will be performing
in this laboratory is not a new discovery, we are going to treat it as
such! You will burn a measured quantity of magnesium in the presence of
air (your source of oxygen) and then use mass measurements to determine
a possible formula for the resultant product:
x Mg(atoms) + y O (atoms) ==> MgxOy
(molecule)
Note:
When no integer appears before a atom or molecule in the balanced
chemical equation, it is inferred that only one molecule is produced, thus
the product of the above reaction is written as MgxOy
and not 1 MgxOy.
The amount of magnesium is readily determined by weighing
the initial amount of it. Assuming that one gets complete conversion to
the product MgxOy, then by weighing the amount of
product produced, the amount of oxygen that reacted can be determined (mass
of the product - mass of magnesium used). Knowing the mass of each, we
can convert these masses to moles, and then determine the mole ratio of
magnesium to oxygen.
Remember, that an atom is the smallest particle of
an element that still retains the chemical properties of that element and
thus the mole ratio should turn out to be a whole number or by simple multiplication
can be transformed into a whole number. However the resultant formula is
not necessarily the actual formula since all that we have determined is
the ratio of one atom to the other, e.g.
Mg/O = 1:1, could be MgO, Mg2O2,
Mg3O3……etc, i.e. any combination whose atom ratio
is 1:1
What if the mole ratio is not an integer?..i.e. Mg/O
= 1.66:1. The temptation is to round the 1.66 up 2.00 and thus obtain
a ratio of 2:1. Do not do this! One method is to express the
number as a fraction, i.e. 1.66 = 5/3 and thus by multiplying the ratio
by 3 one would get a ratio 5:3. Another way is to multiply the ratio
in increments of one until you obtain a whole number ratio:
Mg/O = 1.66 : 1 = 2(1:66 : 1) = 3.32 : 2 = 3(1.66
: 1) = 4.98 : 3
It is now safe to round 4.98 to 5 and obtain 5:3.
This latter method may look cumbersome, but it works all the time and it
does not depend on you recognizing fractions!
Mg/O = 5:3, could be Mg5O3,
Mg10O6 ….etc, again any combination whose atom ratio
is 5:3.
The formula based on the simplest mole ratio is referred
to as the empirical formula. In order
to get the actual formula we would need one more piece of data, the
actual molar mass of the compound.
Recording Data and Significant Figures
Significant Figures:
Since this is your first experiment, and many of
the experiments that you will be performing are quantitative in nature
(meaning the result is a determined number), lets delve briefly into significant
figures. In most experiments many different kinds of measurements are made
using a variety of different equipment, some of which measure to a higher
degree of precision than others. It then makes sense that a calculated
result based on these measurements can be no more precise than the least
precise measurement that went into that calculation. This is the essence
of significant figures.
-
In adding or subtracting measurements, the number of decimal places in
the answer should equal the measurement with the fewest decimal places.
-
In determining the number of significant figures in a measurement, read
from left to right and count all digits, starting with the first digit
that is not zero: e.g.
-
0.049g: 2 Significant figures
-
2.0g: 2 Significant figures
Constants are considered to have infinite number of significant figures.
Put in another way, these quantities should not be used in determining
the measurement with the least number of significant figures.
-
In multiplication and division, the number of significant figures in the
calculated quantity should be the same as the quantity used with the fewest
number of significant figures.
Note:
When using a calculator, do the calculation using all the digits allowed
by the calculator and round off the final answer.
Rounding: round up if the digit after the last significant figure equals
or is greater than 5.
With regards to the laboratory only:
-
you may treat as a constant any reagent concentrations given in an experiment.
-
if in doubt use one more rather than one less significant figure.
-
we are primarily concerned with significant figures only in the final answers.
With all other data we are concerned with recording the data to the accuracy
of the instrument used.
Recording Data:
This is one area
where we place a lot of emphasis. Always record the data so that it reflects
the accuracy of the instrument used. With digital instruments that simply
means recording all the digits displayed, even zeros!
With other
equipment you record to 1/10th or 1/5th of the smallest division. In the
case of a buret, the smallest division is 0.1 therefore you should record
to two decimal places in increments of 0.01 or 0.02 depending on you ability
to guesstimate! With a 400mL beaker, the smallest division is 25mL, therefore
you should record this in increments of either 2.5mL or 5mL .
Experimental Procedure:
Using an Electronic Balance
Please
be aware that these balances are somewhat delicate and very sensitive.
Do not remove the plastic guard around each. While it may not always be
practical to do so, it is good practice to stick with the same balance
during any particular experiment. Pictured are the three models of
analytical balances that we use in the General Chemistry program here.
During the first lab, your TA will demonstrate the various idiosyncrasies
of each! When doing any weighing, please observe the following:
-
Do not remove the plastic guard around each balance.
-
Do not move the balance, this throws off the calibration
and necessitates recalibration of the balance.
-
Weigh chemicals in containers that are dry on the
outside. Never weigh directly on the pan.
-
Weigh everything at room temperature.
-
Zero the balance and keep the draft doors closed
during weighing. Avoid leaning on the benches as this in fact interferes
with the weighing!
PLEASE LEAVE THE BALANCE CLEANER THAN YOU FOUND
IT. Brushes have been attached to each balance to facilitate this
Determining the Formula of a Compound
-
Wash a crucible with soap, rinse with tap water and finally distilled water.
You will not be able to get the inside immaculately clean but anything
that remains after washing thoroughly and heating will not affect the reaction.
-
Support
the crucible on a tripod using a clay triangle, as depicted in the diagram
-
Heat the crucible for two to three minutes using a hot (blue) flame. This
will burn off any moisture and any impurities in the crucible. (A yellow
flame will deposit carbon on the crucible and destroy any hope of getting
meaningful results.)
-
When cool, handling the crucible with a paper towel, place it on top of
a 50mL beaker and weigh it on the analytical balance (Do not place anything
hot directly on the balances). Only weigh the crucible and beaker.
-
Cut a piece of magnesium equivalent to ~0.2-0.25g. magnesium develops
a coating of magnesium oxide over time. To remove this use the sand
paper provided. Please do not do this on the bench top as sand paper
leaves unsightly marks!!. Once you have sand papered the magnesium,
transfer it to the crucible. Reweigh and record.
|

|
- Heat
the
entire crucible and its contents with a moderately vigorous blue flame.
The magnesium will start to glow, but if it ignites like that depicted
on the right, quickly using tongs, place the cover on the crucible (as
depicted on the left). Continue to heat for 8-10 minutes, removing and
covering the crucible any time it ignites too vigorously. Allow it
to cool to room temperature.
|
 |
|
As we are using air as our source of oxygen (remember air is predominantly
nitrogen) we may form some magnesium nitride and we need to convert any
of this formed to the oxide. Hence step 7. |
|
 |
- Carefully
add 10 drops of distilled water to the crucible using a dropper. Make sure
that all the white powder stays inside the crucible.
-
Heat using a blue flame for five minutes. Allow it to cool. Weigh
and record.
-
Continue this heating, cooling, re-weighing, until you get two readings
that do not differ by more than 0.001g.
-
Repeat the whole procedure with a second sample.
-
Determine the moles of magnesium and oxygen atoms that reacted and then
the mole ratio.
|